Author Archive

Why Google+ Will Be Competitive with Facebook

Google+ weaved into Google's other properties

Google+'s integration into its other mainstream products gives the social network a competitive edge.

I hate to say it: there’s yet another social network where you need to create another profile and connect with the same people and brands you’re already in touch with elsewhere.

I’ve seen plenty of frustration about Google+ this past week on Facebook, but there are a plethora of reasons why Google’s foray into social media this time around will be successful (if you missed their earlier attempt with Google Buzz, read here). The ease of creating groups of people (circles), the way photos are displayed and the mere fact that the search engine giant is proactively listening to users to improve the product are among them.

The most overwhelming aspect to me is this: Google, which is integrated into so many of our daily lives–searching, e-mail, calendar, docs–has added an omnipresent strip to all those pages. And when someone interacts with us, a space in the upper right-hand corner turns red with a number.

While I personally do worry about putting too many eggs into one basket, this simple, yet genius layout feature will be key to Google+’s dominance in social networking.

If you’re on the Google+ bandwagon, join me. You can also follow me on Twitter and “like” me on Facebook.

On Eating Less Sugar

This gargantuan photo is of a deep-fried fluffernutter sandwich with bananas that I ate the other night at the just-opened Black Market Liquor Bar in Studio City. When the waiter put it down on the table, I was a bit overwhelmed by its obnoxious size, but went ahead anyway and took a bite.

My eyes list up and church choir music began to ring in my head. (my roommate had a similar reaction, though, I’m sure it was of a Judaic nature.) I’ve had my share of deep-fried county fair fare, but this topped my list by far. Needless to say, I killed the sandwich.

Excited to share the new neighborhood haunt, we went back the next night with a friend of my roommate, in which the fluffernutter made a comeback. This time, however, I did not participate.

For the past two months, I’ve been cutting down on sugar. When I started my job last November, it was the first time I had worked in an office since 2005. And what comes with most office environs? Snacks. Lots of them. And usually sugary. This is not to say that I hadn’t eaten copious amounts of sweets from the kitchen when I worked at home, but the generosity of my co-workers put me over the tipping point. Enough that they uncovered my alter ego, the slyly-named Snack Behrens.

So I made a fast break and cut it out. The first thing I noticed was that my sleep improved dramatically. I would fall asleep more easily and wake up feel much more rested. I’ve also lost some weight with ease and I’m sure my blood tests results will be improved as well, which is not a bad thing.

This is not to say I don’t eat sugar–ahem, the above photo?–but I only do it on special occasions like food I’ve never experienced before–once again, the photo–co-workers who baked a pie (Michael Pollan’s Rule 17: Eat food cooked by humans, not corporations) and moments of camaraderie such as ice cream Thursdays at the office. I’ll also eat food with natural sugar, such as the blueberries I ate every morning last week with my breakfast.

Being so cavalier with sweets feels good at the moment, but the decision to eat less has been good in the long run. I think I’ll stick with it–except for the next time I encounter some deep-fried dessert that raises Snack’s eyebrows.

Your Next Writing Gig: Determined by Klout?

I was speaking to a recent college graduate/aspiring full-time writer the other day, and she said something that was very curious to me: prospective employers of writers or editors who are hiring freelancers are using Klout scores as part of the process. As someone who hires writers, the thought of using the social media measurement tool–their slogan: “The Standard for Influence”– has never crossed my mind.

If you’re catching up, Klout approaches your online presence as something scalable and measurable. It “isn’t about figuring out who is on the ‘A-list,’ the say. “We believe that every person who creates content has influence. Our mission is to help every individual understand and leverage their influence.”

While using credit scores to determine a hire has been controversial in the past, I wasn’t sure how widespread Klout was in new hires, so I turned to the internet to find if others shared the experienced.

Over at ZDNet last month, Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols found himself in a similar situation:

Now you think “What nonsense! Who cares what your Klout score is!” I’d agree… until a few months ago when I was in the early stages of a book deal and the publisher insisted on knowing what my Klout score was.

And London-based blogger Antonia Harler back in December:

You know, it’s hard enough finding a job that you love without an additional number being used to compare you to the rest. And I so wish, companies would quit looking at Klout scores. I really do. It’s being used as a measure of success and that rubs me the completely wrong way. I was once told “This isn’t so good (referred to something I did), but you have a high Klout score, so you might be successful in the future after all.” If I hadn’t been so shocked about the ridicule of that statement by itself, I would have cracked up. I’m hardly ever speechless but that just left me staring at the person as though I’d just seen a ghost.

And Michelle Tripp at the BrandForward Blog:

At a recent Klout-Up in NYC, an HR recruiter was overheard talking about how they’re starting to use Klout to evaluate job applicants. When questioned by a Klout employee, the recruiter said they were using a score of “around 30″ as a gauge of minimum influence.

Yeah. Not only are they looking at your resume, Linkedin, Google footprint, Facebook activity, and Twitter feed… they’re also looking at where you stand in the social influence hierarchy.

There are plenty of more examples, and they and the above are not all writing gig-related, but you get the point.

From where I stand, as someone in public media who hires journalists, Klout has yet to play a factor. Maybe it will in the future, but right now it has zero influence on who I assign a story to.

I want solid writers and journalists. If they happen to have good influence, that’s great, but their craft and knowledge of a subject is of the utmost importance to me. I’m not going to give a bad writer a job just because their going to spike traffic for a day.

Don’t get me wrong, I do believe all writers need to work on social media and their personal brand, especially those who have yet to establish themselves–I have, after all, met writers through social media and later hired them–but it’s not the end-all-be-all. Social media is just one function of the bigger picture of marketing and relationships.

But back to Klout, or other measurement tools that come along in the future, as a determining factor in the hiring process for journalists. I personally still have a hard time thinking this is a tool I will use, but I’m sure I’ll come around, with a healthy balance, of course.

One part of me says, “You’re in public media, your goal is not just about pageviews, it’s about filling a void of news coverage that is in the public interest.” Another part says, “But someone with great Klout can help reach those communities seeking and in need of the important coverage we are providing.”

Are you an editor or writer who has some thoughts on Klout? Let me know in the comments.

Thanks for reading my post. Feel free to join me on Facebook and Twitter as well.

I love longreads: ‘How to Spot a Psychopath’ & ‘Why Isn’t Wall Street in Jail?’

With extra time that bus/subway commuting has brought me, I’ve become addicted to longreads.com, a website by a fellow public transit user (in NYC) who curates some of the best in long-form journalism. “I love longreads” is a series that highlights my favorite pieces and why.

The Guardian last month ran an exclusive excerpt from Jon Ronson’s latest and ingeniously-titled book, “How to Spot a Psychopath.” Don’t judge this by its cover, though, as it is not a cheesy how-to. Rather, there’s story arc and all the good stuff that makes you want to turn the page (or scroll down on your iPad).

What struck me the most was a quote from Bob Hare, famous criminal psychologist and  father of the Psychopathy Checklist (and its revised version). “Serial killers ruin families,” he said. “Corporate and political and religious psychopaths ruin economies. They ruin societies.”

There I sat in the subway station feeling a bit stunned. This wasn’t surprising news to me, but I guess I never thought about it much lately. With the recession still having its effects, Hare’s words struck me with powerful relevance.

The recession has spawned movies and documentaries, books, radio show topics and endless headlines for the news business, yet it feels like the actual people behind the crash have stayed largely out of the picture. Albeit smaller scale, Enron, this has not been.

Nobody has gone to jail.

“This is the mantra of the financial-crisis era, one that saw virtually every major bank and financial company on Wall Street embroiled in obscene criminal scandals that impoverished millions and collectively destroyed hundreds of billions, in fact, trillions of dollars of the world’s wealth — and nobody went to jail,” explained Matt Taibbi in a February article in Rolling Stone. “Nobody, that is, except Bernie Madoff, a flamboyant and pathological celebrity con artist, whose victims happened to be other rich and famous people.”

Read Ronson’s and Taibbi’s pieces here:

No more superfluous 3D

I saw the fourth installment of “Pirates of the Caribbean” this weekend. While I thought it was weak, story-wise, my complaint is about the 3D. The movie, which was not shot for an eye-popping experience like “Avatar” was, just didn’t  need it. Basically, The only value-added thing about it was the price of the ticket–and that had no benefit for me.

From now on, unless a movie is made specifically to be 3D, I’m going to actively search for it the old-fashioned way. Consider me as contributing to this Hollywood problem, described by the New York Times this weekend:

Ripples of fear spread across Hollywood last week after “Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides,” which cost Walt Disney Studios an estimated $400 million to make and market, did poor 3-D business in North America. While event movies have typically done 60 percent of their business in 3-D, “Stranger Tides” sold just 47 percent in 3-D. “The American consumer is rejecting 3-D,” Richard Greenfield, an analyst at the financial services company BTIG, wrote of the “Stranger Tides” results.

Rejecting is what I witnessed when one 50-something couple exited the theatre Saturday night. They complained of “Pirates” being too dark–the glasses dim the picture, something you discover when you inevitably take a peek at the screen without them, just to see what it looks like.

“It’s supposed to be that way,” said an usher.

“No it isn’t,” the man replied, “‘Avatar’ wasn’t like this.”

She explained that the James Cameron epic was made for 3D and Pirates was converted to 3D.

“Ridiculous,” he said, walking away.

(h/t to my roommate for pointing out the NYT 3D article to me)

I love longreads: Outside Magazine on bicycle commuting

With extra time that bus/subway commuting has brought me, I’ve become addicted to longreads.com, a website by a fellow public transit user (in NYC) who curates some of the best in long-form journalism. “I love longreads” is a series that highlights my favorite pieces and why.

In the summer of 2007, I took to the bike for three months and went all out: bought a Metro monthly pass, a bicycle basket, a new helmet and lights. Over those 90 days, I learned a lot about the streets from an on-the-ground perspective.

The good: It’s liberating, beautiful, you learn a lot about the city, you meet more people, you get exercise, you’re always hungry and parking is a lot easier.

But the most obvious lesson was that it’s dangerous out there, though education has been improving over the years. Not only did I have to call the police twice on drivers who purposely tried to hit, or at least intimidate me, even city-hired workers like LADOT Dash drivers were not very careful around cyclists.

Secondly, many cyclists are drivers, including me. What those three months taught me was what it’s like to be on both sides of the road, so to speak. Yes, it’s frustrating for the few seconds you might be stuck behind a cyclist in a narrow lane, but you understand. You’ve been there before and now you’re patiently cruising without your foot on the pedal until there’s a safe moment to pass.

This is why I enjoyed Tom Vanderbilt’s “Rage Against Your Machine” in Outside Magazine. The deck:

What is it about cyclists that can turn sane, law-abiding drivers into shrieking maniacs? The author ponders the eternal conflict with help from bike supercommuter Joe Simonetti, who each week survives the hostile, traffic-clogged rat race between the New York exurbs and Midtown Manhattan.

Read the full article here.

 

And we’re back…

I once had a blog on this domain, but abandoned it when I became Editor at LAist in late 2009. Then the hackbots took over. Then I didn’t update my WordPress or server software and some glitch happened causing a coding error.

In truth, these are all excuses.

What really happened is that I made it too complicated on myself. I wanted to customize my WordPress blog and jazz it all up. But that ended up being a haphazard exercise–I wouldn’t, even today, consider my coder, even if I can maneuver a good deal of HTML, CSS, Javascript, PHP, etc–that would end in frustration. And that led to not wanting to deal with fixing problems.

So here we are: a fresh start.

Firstly, I’m now dedicated to having everything here automated. That means no more hand-coding. I had my web host install WordPress and will do the same with any plug-ins, themes, etc. And if there is something I can’t do that way, I’ll suck it up and hire someone or beg a friend by luring them with thai food, or something. This approach is much more simple, but more importantly, relaxing.

And what will I be doing here? Probably a bit of everything. For those who follow me on Twitter, I break any so-called rules on sticking to one theme and community.

I live in Los Angeles, California, so I tweet a lot about the city, region and state I live in. I like the outdoors, environmental issues, politics and vegetarian food, so I tweet a lot about that, too, usually in connection with, yes, California. I work and love media–I’m a news junkie–thus lots of media-related tweets. I used to work in local government and was frustrated/excited about technology within that framework, so I like sharing Government 2.0 information. I have a degree in music from an art school, thus any interest in arts.

See? It’s all over the place. Expect the same here. This is my personal blog, after all.

I will also probably use this as a place to practice some writing techniques. Now that I work at KCET–where 99% of my writing will actually live–I take advantage of its East Hollywood location near a subway station. With a hands-free commute, I’ve become addicted to longreads.com (read on my iPad via Instapaper), which has been leaving me with the desire to write in a more literary journalism approach. So expect some of that, too, whether in long or short form.

All that said, I reserve the right to change the direction of this blog at any point. The likelihood of that happening is, well, I don’t know. At this point it doesn’t matter. I just want an outlet to write about what doesn’t necessarily fit in at work. So here we go…